It would be perilous to view this analysis as a petty shredding of individuals. The real peril is to allow ourselves to be lost in any further sense than has occurred in the decline of Europeans as a type, the erosion of their empires, and the dissolution of their countries.
I am not arguing against the choice, private or public. The issue is not choice. The issue is, once again, the peril of forlornness. Again, to find even one more sense of dislocation. To deepen this point, below is a short analysis that I wrote and archived earlier:
"A homosexual is an incomplete man. Even the most masculine and presumably the most manly of all homosexuals is so. If this were not so, they would never allow or have a desire to be penetrated. A woman has two holes, every man only one. If he wants a woman, why opt for an inferior male instead of a biological female? Is it because he wants to see flashes of a male face? To have his anal orifice prodded? The answers suggest an incompleteness."
"The woman in him has become so strong that she demands the contextual countenance of a man, even a weak man. A man, strong or weak, must be brought to this inner woman."
The danger of functionalism threatens coherence and consistency in and among the thinking of nationalists. Functionalism, here understood and applied, is the view that what is relevant is not form or structure but, rather, activity, role, and movement. To understand something, from a functionalist point of view, is to prioritize function over form. An example of functionalism in contemporary society is the notion of transitioning in gender roles.
Talk of a man "transitioning to a woman" is based on the idea that, to be a woman, a person must act like a woman. And a woman, from a purely functionalist point of view, is submissive, passive, and deferential, aiming to please. Form is mostly irrelevant.
By contrast, a structuralist gives priority to form over function. To him, a woman is a human that has mammary glands, breasts for extraction by an infant, a vagina with all the associated organs and tissues requisite to make insemination and pregnancy possible. From his point of view, functional roles arise and grow out of structural ones. A woman is deferential or passive, from his perspective, because these traits compliment her biological role.
"The woman in him has become so strong that she demands the contextual countenance of a man, even a weak man. A man, strong or weak, must be brought to this inner woman."
The danger of functionalism threatens coherence and consistency in and among the thinking of nationalists. Functionalism, here understood and applied, is the view that what is relevant is not form or structure but, rather, activity, role, and movement. To understand something, from a functionalist point of view, is to prioritize function over form. An example of functionalism in contemporary society is the notion of transitioning in gender roles.
Talk of a man "transitioning to a woman" is based on the idea that, to be a woman, a person must act like a woman. And a woman, from a purely functionalist point of view, is submissive, passive, and deferential, aiming to please. Form is mostly irrelevant.
By contrast, a structuralist gives priority to form over function. To him, a woman is a human that has mammary glands, breasts for extraction by an infant, a vagina with all the associated organs and tissues requisite to make insemination and pregnancy possible. From his point of view, functional roles arise and grow out of structural ones. A woman is deferential or passive, from his perspective, because these traits compliment her biological role.
This distinction helps to draw out the sense of incompleteness I am suggesting in that the transitory nature of gender roles is shallow. Transitioning could occur frequently in the course of a day. A person could shift many times between dominant and passive.
Civilizational, national, social, and familial decline, everywhere and all around us, must now be faced in tandem with one of the most basic facets of our existence. "Transitioning" breeds and abets confusion and dislocation, the last thing we need in our unenviable contexts.
